Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 866c3b97
Paper published April 1, 2025
Entry analyzed May 4, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Graph-Based LLM Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) employing alignment safeguards and safety mechanisms are vulnerable to graph-based adversarial attacks that bypass these protections. The attack, termed "Graph of Attacks" (GOAT), leverages…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(4)

  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 7B
  • Vicuna 13B
  • Vicuna 7B

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) employing alignment safeguards and safety mechanisms are vulnerable to graph-based adversarial attacks that bypass these protections. The attack, termed "Graph of Attacks" (GOAT), leverages a graph-based reasoning framework to iteratively refine prompts and exploit vulnerabilities more effectively than previous methods. The attack synthesizes information across multiple reasoning paths to generate human-interpretable prompts that elicit undesired or harmful outputs from the LLM, even without access to the model's internal parameters.

Examples

See Table 1 and Table 3 in the paper arXiv:2504.19019 (opens in a new tab).

Impact

Successful exploitation allows adversaries to bypass safety protocols and elicit harmful, illegal, or unethical responses from LLMs. This can lead to the generation of malicious code, misinformation campaigns, privacy violations, and other security breaches. The impact is amplified with stronger "Prompt Generator" LLMs used within the attack framework improving success rate.

Affected Systems

LLMs using alignment strategies and safety mechanisms (e.g., fine-tuning, RLHF), including but not limited to: Vicuna, Llama2, GPT-4, Claude-3

Mitigation Steps

  • Enhance LLM safety mechanisms to be more resilient to iterative prompt refinements and multi-path reasoning attacks.
  • Improve detection mechanisms for adversarial prompts, focusing on prompt structure and iterative patterns.
  • Develop robust filtering and evaluation systems capable of identifying harmful intent even within seemingly benign contexts.
  • Employ diverse and more powerful language models in safety evaluations.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
LLMs using alignment strategies and safety mechanisms (e.g., fine-tuning, RLHF), including but not limited to: Vicuna, Llama2, GPT-4, Claude-3

Research Paper

Graph of Attacks: Improved Black-Box and Interpretable Jailbreaks for LLMs

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2504.19019