Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: ad1f4774
Paper published October 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Gibberish-Suffix LLM Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking via the addition of adversarial suffixes generated by models like AmpleGCG-Plus. These suffixes, often consisting of gibberish or nonsensical text, cause the…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(9)

GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4o +6 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Guanaco 7B
  • Guanaco 13B
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Vicuna 13B
  • Vicuna 7B

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking via the addition of adversarial suffixes generated by models like AmpleGCG-Plus. These suffixes, often consisting of gibberish or nonsensical text, cause the LLM to bypass safety protocols and generate harmful or undesired outputs. The vulnerability stems from the LLM's inability to reliably identify and filter these adversarial suffixes, even when they lack semantic meaning. AmpleGCG-Plus significantly improves the success rate and efficiency of this attack compared to previous methods.

Examples

See the AmpleGCG-Plus paper's repository for datasets and examples of successful adversarial suffixes. Specific examples are numerous and context-dependent, varying according to the targeted LLM and the desired harmful output.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows attackers to bypass LLMs' safety mechanisms, leading to the generation of harmful content, including but not limited to: instructions for illegal activities, malicious code, hate speech, personal information disclosure, and disinformation campaigns. The impact is exacerbated by the ease and efficiency of generating these adversarial suffixes using AmpleGCG-Plus.

Affected Systems

Various LLMs, including but not limited to Llama-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4o, and models protected by circuit breaker defenses, are susceptible. The vulnerability is not limited to specific model architectures or sizes.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improve LLM safety mechanisms to better detect and filter out-of-distribution (OOD) inputs, including gibberish or nonsensical sequences.
  • Develop more robust defenses against adversarial attacks, going beyond techniques that are easily bypassed by the generation of diverse adversarial suffixes.
  • Implement advanced input sanitization and filtering techniques to detect and block potentially harmful suffixes, considering the inherent challenges of identifying OOD adversarial inputs.
  • Regularly update and retrain LLMs with more comprehensive datasets including a larger variety of adversarial examples, particularly those generated by techniques such as AmpleGCG-Plus.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Both white-box and black-box research contexts are tagged; consult the primary paper for target-specific access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Various LLMs, including but not limited to Llama-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4o, and models protected by circuit breaker defenses, are susceptible. The vulnerability is not limited to specific model architectures or…

Research Paper

AmpleGCG-Plus: A Strong Generative Model of Adversarial Suffixes to Jailbreak LLMs with Higher Success Rates in Fewer Attempts

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22143