Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 3be9c2e8
Paper published October 1, 2023
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

AutoDAN: Interpretable LLM Jailbreak

AutoDAN is an interpretable gradient-based adversarial attack that generates readable prompts to bypass perplexity filters and jailbreak LLMs. The attack crafts prompts that elicit harmful behaviors while maintaining…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(7)

GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, Guanaco 7B +4 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Guanaco 7B
  • Llama 2 Chat
  • Pythia 12B
  • Vicuna 13B
  • Vicuna 7B

Description

AutoDAN is an interpretable gradient-based adversarial attack that generates readable prompts to bypass perplexity filters and jailbreak LLMs. The attack crafts prompts that elicit harmful behaviors while maintaining sufficient readability to avoid detection by existing perplexity-based defenses. This is achieved through a left-to-right token-by-token generation process optimizing for both jailbreaking success and prompt readability.

Examples

See paper Appendix D.5 and project website for examples of AutoDAN-generated prompts; specific examples are too lengthy to reproduce here.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms in LLMs, leading to the generation of harmful content (e.g., toxic, racist, illegal, or privacy-breaching content), information leakage (e.g., system prompts), and other unintended behaviors.

Affected Systems

Large Language Models (LLMs) vulnerable to gradient-based adversarial attacks, including but not limited to Vicuna-7B, Vicuna-13B, Guanaco-7B, Pythia-12B, GPT-3.5-turbo, and GPT-4. The vulnerability is not limited to specific models and may affect other LLMs with similar architectures or training methodologies.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improve Perplexity Filters: Develop more robust perplexity filters that are less susceptible to evasion by readable adversarial prompts. Consider incorporating additional features beyond simple perplexity scores.
  • Enhance Safety Training: Improve the robustness of safety training data and methods to better generalize to unforeseen scenarios and attack strategies employed by AutoDAN. The training should focus on mitigating the specific strategies identified in the AutoDAN attack (e.g., "shifting domains," "detailizing instructions").
  • Implement Multi-Stage Defenses: Utilize multiple layers of defense mechanisms beyond perplexity checks, particularly involving post-processing filtering and human-in-the-loop verification of generated responses.
  • Regular Updates: Continuously monitor for and update the defense mechanisms against newly emerging attack techniques and strategies. Regularly audit models both white-box and using techniques similar to AutoDAN to identify potential weaknesses.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Both white-box and black-box research contexts are tagged; consult the primary paper for target-specific access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Large Language Models (LLMs) vulnerable to gradient-based adversarial attacks, including but not limited to Vicuna-7B, Vicuna-13B, Guanaco-7B, Pythia-12B, GPT-3.5-turbo, and GPT-4. The vulnerability is not limited to…

Research Paper

Autodan: Automatic and interpretable adversarial attacks on large language models

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2310.15140