The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.
Pervasive Multi-turn Jailbreaks
Multiple open-weight Large Language Models (LLMs)—specifically those prioritizing capability over safety alignment—exhibit a critical vulnerability to adaptive multi-turn prompt injection and jailbreak attacks. While…
Paper-evaluated models(8)
GPT-oss 20B, Llama 3.3 70B Instruct, Mistral Large 2 +5 more
- GPT-oss 20B
- Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
- Mistral Large 2
- DeepSeek V3.1
- Qwen 3 32B
- Gemma 3 1B
- Phi-4
- GLM 4.5 Air
Description
Multiple open-weight Large Language Models (LLMs)—specifically those prioritizing capability over safety alignment—exhibit a critical vulnerability to adaptive multi-turn prompt injection and jailbreak attacks. While these models effectively reject isolated, single-turn adversarial inputs (averaging ~13.11% Attack Success Rate), they fail to maintain safety guardrails and policy enforcement across extended conversational contexts. By leveraging iterative strategies such as "Crescendo" (gradual escalation), "Contextual Ambiguity," and "Role-Play," attackers can bypass safety filters. In automated testing, this vulnerability resulted in Attack Success Rates (ASR) increasing by 2x to 10x, reaching up to 92.78% in Mistral Large-2 and 86.18% in Qwen3-32B. The vulnerability stems from the models' inability to retain forceful rejection states or detect intent drift over long context windows.
Examples
Specific verbatim prompt logs were not disclosed in the text, but the vulnerability is reproducible using the following adaptive strategies described in the assessment methodology:
- Crescendo Attack:
- Method: The attacker begins with benign queries to establish trust and context.
- Execution: The attacker requests "harmless" coding segments or fictional scenarios. Over 5-10 turns, the attacker subtly introduces adversarial elements, refining the prompt based on previous model responses until the model outputs a full malicious script or prohibited content.
- Reference: See "Analysis" section regarding the evolution from harmless code to malicious scripts.
- Strategy Implementation:
- The vulnerability is triggered using the Cisco AI Validation methodology or similar automated red-teaming frameworks using an "Attacker Model" (e.g., GPT-3.5 Turbo) configured with the following specific strategies:
- Information Decomposition and Reassembly
- Role-Play
- Refusal Reframe
- See "Section 4.2 Multi-Turn Evaluation" for parameter details.
Impact
- Safety Guardrail Bypass: Attackers can force the model to generate content explicitly prohibited by its safety training, including hate speech, misinformation, and sexually explicit text.
- Malicious Code Generation: High-capability models can be steered to generate functional malware or exploit scripts that are refused in single-turn contexts.
- Contextual Manipulation: In RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) or agentic deployments, this vulnerability allows attackers to manipulate the model's context to exfiltrate data or perform unauthorized actions via tool-use capabilities.
Affected Systems
The vulnerability was confirmed in the following open-weight models (specific versions tested):
- Mistral: Large-2 (Large-Instruct-2047) - 92.78% Multi-turn ASR
- Alibaba: Qwen3-32B - 86.18% Multi-turn ASR
- Meta: Llama 3.3-70B-Instruct
- DeepSeek: v3.1
- Microsoft: Phi-4
- Zhipu AI: GLM 4.5-Air
- OpenAI: GPT-OSS-20b
- Google: Gemma 3-1B-IT (Lowest susceptibility, but still affected)
Mitigation Steps
- Context-Aware Guardrails: Implement third-party, model-agnostic runtime guardrails that monitor the full conversation history (input and output) rather than isolated prompts to detect intent drift.
- System Prompt Hardening: Deploy strict, use-case-specific meta-prompts that explicitly prevent user instructions from overriding core safety rules, regardless of conversation length.
- Adversarial Fine-tuning: Perform fine-tuning on datasets containing multi-turn adversarial examples to teach the model to maintain refusals across extended interactions.
- Rate Limiting and Monitoring: Implement rate limiting to disrupt automated iterative attacks and log all inputs/responses for anomaly detection.
- Input/Output Filtering: Do not rely solely on the model's internal alignment; use external filtering mechanisms to reject off-topic or policy-violating requests before they reach the model.
- Scope Restriction: Strictly scope the model's integration with downstream plugins or automation tools to prevent high-impact consequences if the model is jailbroken.
Research context and confidence
- Evidence and verification
- Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
- Primary research source linked.
- Severity
- Not rated by this catalog.
- Source and publication type
- arXiv · Research preprint.
- Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
- Author and publication status
- Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
- Threat model and attacker access
- Black-box model, service, or application access.
- Related deployment categories
- No related deployment category is classified.
- Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
- Affected systems
- The vulnerability was confirmed in the following open-weight models (specific versions tested): Mistral: Large-2 (Large-Instruct-2047) - 92.78% Multi-turn ASR Alibaba: Qwen3-32B - 86.18% Multi-turn ASR Meta: Llama…
Research Paper
Death by a Thousand Prompts: Open Model Vulnerability Analysis
Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.
View PaperEvidence
This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2511.03247Related research
- AutoDAN: Interpretable LLM Jailbreak
Published October 1, 2023 · model-layer, injection, jailbreak
- Agent Lifecycle Compound Threats
Published March 1, 2026 · application-layer, infrastructure-layer, prompt-layer
- Voice Agent Behavioral Bypass
Published February 1, 2026 · model-layer, application-layer, injection