Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 37b7539b
Paper published May 1, 2025
Entry analyzed May 31, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Hidden Image Jailbreak

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to implicit jailbreak attacks that leverage least significant bit (LSB) steganography to conceal malicious instructions within images. These instructions are…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(6)

Gemini 1.5 Pro, Gemini 2.5 Pro, GPT-4.5 +3 more
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro
  • Gemini 2.5 Pro
  • GPT-4.5
  • GPT-4o
  • InternVL 2 8B
  • Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Description

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to implicit jailbreak attacks that leverage least significant bit (LSB) steganography to conceal malicious instructions within images. These instructions are coupled with seemingly benign image-related text prompts, causing the MLLM to execute the hidden malicious instructions. The attack bypasses existing safety mechanisms by exploiting cross-modal reasoning capabilities.

Examples

See arXiv:2505.16446 (opens in a new tab) for detailed examples and attack methodology. The paper demonstrates successful attacks against GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5 Pro achieving over 90% success rate using an average of 3 queries. Attack vectors include embedding instructions like "Steps to manufacture illegal drugs" into images and pairing them with prompts like "Describe the image." The MLLM then outputs detailed instructions for illegal drug manufacturing.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows adversaries to bypass safety measures and elicit harmful, illegal, or otherwise undesirable outputs from MLLMs, potentially leading to the generation of malicious content.

Affected Systems

Vision-language models, specifically those that incorporate cross-modal reasoning and exhibit vulnerabilities to both text and image-based attacks. The disclosed research shows that commercial models like GPT-4o and Gemini-1.5 Pro are affected.

Mitigation Steps

  • Enhance safety mechanisms to detect and mitigate LSB steganography techniques within image inputs.
  • Develop more robust cross-modal consistency checks to prevent MLLMs from inappropriately associating benign prompts with malicious embedded instructions.
  • Implement more sophisticated filtering and detection systems focusing on the semantic meaning derived from combined image and text input, rather than relying solely on keyword blocking.
  • Employ adversarial training methods to improve the model's resistance to this specific type of attack.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
Vision-language models
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Vision-language models, specifically those that incorporate cross-modal reasoning and exhibit vulnerabilities to both text and image-based attacks. The disclosed research shows that commercial models like GPT-4o and…

Research Paper

Implicit Jailbreak Attacks via Cross-Modal Information Concealment on Vision-Language Models

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.16446