Last analyzed Sep 9, 2026

Language Model Security Database

Explore primary-source AI security research, evaluated models, attack techniques, and defensive evidence.

985 research findings · 1119 evaluated models

Findings

985

Models evaluated

1119

Paper-evaluated models

Any selected model can match.

Refine by category

Findings match every selected category.

Attack Type1 selected

Attack Context1 selected

Architecture Components

Attack Surface1 selected

Impact

Advanced filters

Published fromPublished throughEvidence status

Research indexed from arXiv.

Filtered research findings

4 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

Context privilege escalation in AI agent harnesses

Published Sep 1, 2026Analyzed Sep 9, 2026Source: arXiv

Context assembly can promote repository, tool or skill content into higher-priority instructions or persistent state. The paper studies 12 pinned agent-harness versions.

What's in Your Agent's Context? Context Privilege Escalation Attacks against AI Agent Harness

Evaluated models: GPT-5.5, GPT-5.4-mini, Claude Sonnet 4.6+4 more

GPT-5.5
GPT-5.4-mini
Claude Sonnet 4.6
Claude Opus 4.6
Gemini 2.5 Flash
Gemini 2.5 Pro
DeepSeek V4 Flash

Single-interaction poisoning of agent memory

Published Aug 24, 2026Analyzed Sep 9, 2026Source: arXiv

A stored interaction can later steer a memory-augmented agent's answer without direct memory-store access. The study evaluates persistent response manipulation in MemoryOS and MemGPT.

InjecMEM: Memory Injection Attack on LLM Agent Memory Systems

Evaluated models: Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct, Qwen 2.5 1.5B Instruct, Qwen 2.5 3B Instruct+3 more

Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 1.5B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 3B Instruct
Qwen 2.5 14B Instruct
Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3

Persistent Agent Memory Poisoning and Incomplete Repair

Published Jul 29, 2026Analyzed Aug 13, 2026Source: arXiv

MemSecBench follows malicious agent-memory content from initial write through persistence, retrieval, action selection, execution, and attempted selective repair. Its controlled Write–Execute–Forget protocol evaluates 310 human-reviewed cases across two harnesses, four memory backends, three model backends, and seven evidence-gated lifecycle checkpoints.

MemSecBench: Tracking Agent Memory Poisoning from Persistence to Consequence and Repair

Evaluated models: GPT-5.5, DeepSeek V4-Pro, MiniMax-M3

Workspace Agent Runtime Safety Failures Across Risk Carriers

Published Jul 29, 2026Analyzed Aug 13, 2026Source: arXiv

AgentS4D measures unsafe actions and state changes across complete workspace-agent executions rather than treating task completion or isolated model responses as safety evidence. Its 328 sandboxed cases introduce risky content through user requests, documents, web resources, tools, third-party skills, and persistent memory, then compare the same cases across four agent harnesses and five model backends.

AgentS4D: Benchmarking Runtime Risks across the Execution Lifecycle of LLM-Based Workspace Agents

Evaluated models: GPT-5.5, Gemini 3.1 Pro, DeepSeek V4-Pro+2 more

GPT-5.5
Gemini 3.1 Pro
DeepSeek V4-Pro
MiniMax-M3
Qwen3.7-Plus

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.

Discovery and publication are separate: new papers enter a candidate queue, then require human review and explicit approval before publication. Updates follow that review process, not a guaranteed daily publishing schedule. “Last analyzed” is the newest analysis date among published entries; it does not mean that all recent research has been covered.