Last analyzed Sep 9, 2026

Language Model Security Database

Explore primary-source AI security research, evaluated models, attack techniques, and defensive evidence.

985 research findings · 1119 evaluated models

Findings

985

Models evaluated

1119

Paper-evaluated models

Any selected model can match.

Refine by category

Findings match every selected category.

Attack Type2 selected

Attack Context

Architecture Components1 selected

Attack Surface

Impact

Advanced filters

Published fromPublished throughEvidence status

Research indexed from arXiv.

Filtered research findings

2 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

Mobile Agent Visual Spoofing

Published Feb 11, 2026Analyzed Feb 22, 2026Source: arXiv

Mobile Large Language Model (LLM) agents operating under the "Screen-as-Interface" paradigm are vulnerable to visual indirect prompt injection and state desynchronization. Agents that rely on unstructured visual data (screenshots) and Accessibility Service APIs to perceive the environment lack a mechanism to distinguish between trusted system UI elements and untrusted content (e.g., web pages, emails, or malicious overlays). An attacker can inject visual cues, fake notifications, or hidden…

Blind Gods and Broken Screens: Architecting a Secure, Intent-Centric Mobile Agent Operating System

Evaluated models: Not reported

JailFlip Implicit Harm

Published Jun 9, 2025Analyzed Dec 8, 2025Source: arXiv

A vulnerability exists in the safety alignment mechanisms of Large Language Models (LLMs) (including GPT-4, Claude 3, Gemini, and Qwen families) leading to "Implicit Harm." Unlike traditional jailbreaks that use overtly harmful queries, this vulnerability allows remote attackers to coerce the model into providing factually incorrect, plausible, and dangerous responses to benign-looking inputs. By employing "JailFlip" techniques—specifically constructed affirmative-type or denial-type queries…

Beyond Jailbreaks: Revealing Stealthier and Broader LLM Security Risks Stemming from Alignment Failures

Evaluated models: GPT-4.1, GPT-4.1 Mini, GPT-4o+3 more

GPT-4.1
GPT-4.1 Mini
GPT-4o
GPT-4o Mini
Qwen Plus
Qwen Turbo

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.

Discovery and publication are separate: new papers enter a candidate queue, then require human review and explicit approval before publication. Updates follow that review process, not a guaranteed daily publishing schedule. “Last analyzed” is the newest analysis date among published entries; it does not mean that all recent research has been covered.