Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 38fdb0ac
Paper published July 1, 2025
Entry analyzed July 14, 2025
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Visual Jailbreak via Context Injection

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to visual contextual attacks, where carefully crafted images and accompanying text prompts can bypass safety mechanisms and elicit harmful responses. The…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(6)

Gemini 2.0 Flash, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini +3 more
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • InternVL 2.5 78B
  • LLaVA 7B Chat
  • Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct

Description

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to visual contextual attacks, where carefully crafted images and accompanying text prompts can bypass safety mechanisms and elicit harmful responses. The vulnerability stems from the MLLM's ability to integrate visual and textual context to generate outputs, allowing attackers to create realistic scenarios that subvert safety filters. Specifically, the attack leverages image-driven context injection to construct deceptive multi-turn conversations that gradually lead the MLLM to produce unsafe responses.

Examples

See arXiv:2507.02844v1 (opens in a new tab). The paper provides numerous examples of attacks across different MLLMs, demonstrating how strategically designed images, combined with carefully constructed prompts, can trigger harmful outputs even when the individual elements appear benign.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to the generation of harmful content, including but not limited to hate speech, instructions on illegal activities, and personally identifiable information leaks. This undermines the safety mechanisms intended to protect users and can have significant societal and security implications.

Affected Systems

Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that integrate visual and textual inputs, including but not limited to GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini 2.0-Flash, LLaVA-OV-7B-Chat, InternVL2.5-78B, and Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct. The vulnerability is likely applicable to other MLLMs with similar visual-language processing capabilities.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improve the robustness of safety filters to better detect deceptive contextual information, including visual cues.
  • Develop techniques to identify and mitigate the influence of fabricated dialogue histories.
  • Implement stricter multimodal input validation and sanitization procedures.
  • Further research into the development of more sophisticated and resilient safety mechanisms for MLLMs is needed.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
Vision-language models
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that integrate visual and textual inputs, including but not limited to GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini 2.0-Flash, LLaVA-OV-7B-Chat, InternVL2.5-78B, and Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct. The…

Research Paper

Visual Contextual Attack: Jailbreaking MLLMs with Image-Driven Context Injection

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02844