The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.
Visual Jailbreak via Context Injection
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to visual contextual attacks, where carefully crafted images and accompanying text prompts can bypass safety mechanisms and elicit harmful responses. The…
Paper-evaluated models(6)
Gemini 2.0 Flash, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini +3 more
- Gemini 2.0 Flash
- GPT-4o
- GPT-4o Mini
- InternVL 2.5 78B
- LLaVA 7B Chat
- Qwen 2.5 VL 72B Instruct
Description
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to visual contextual attacks, where carefully crafted images and accompanying text prompts can bypass safety mechanisms and elicit harmful responses. The vulnerability stems from the MLLM's ability to integrate visual and textual context to generate outputs, allowing attackers to create realistic scenarios that subvert safety filters. Specifically, the attack leverages image-driven context injection to construct deceptive multi-turn conversations that gradually lead the MLLM to produce unsafe responses.
Examples
See arXiv:2507.02844v1 (opens in a new tab). The paper provides numerous examples of attacks across different MLLMs, demonstrating how strategically designed images, combined with carefully constructed prompts, can trigger harmful outputs even when the individual elements appear benign.
Impact
Successful exploitation of this vulnerability can lead to the generation of harmful content, including but not limited to hate speech, instructions on illegal activities, and personally identifiable information leaks. This undermines the safety mechanisms intended to protect users and can have significant societal and security implications.
Affected Systems
Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that integrate visual and textual inputs, including but not limited to GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini 2.0-Flash, LLaVA-OV-7B-Chat, InternVL2.5-78B, and Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct. The vulnerability is likely applicable to other MLLMs with similar visual-language processing capabilities.
Mitigation Steps
- Improve the robustness of safety filters to better detect deceptive contextual information, including visual cues.
- Develop techniques to identify and mitigate the influence of fabricated dialogue histories.
- Implement stricter multimodal input validation and sanitization procedures.
- Further research into the development of more sophisticated and resilient safety mechanisms for MLLMs is needed.
Research context and confidence
- Evidence and verification
- Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
- Primary research source linked.
- Severity
- Not rated by this catalog.
- Source and publication type
- arXiv · Research preprint.
- Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
- Author and publication status
- Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
- Threat model and attacker access
- Black-box model, service, or application access.
- Related deployment categories
- Vision-language models
- Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
- Affected systems
- Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) that integrate visual and textual inputs, including but not limited to GPT-4o, GPT-4o-mini, Gemini 2.0-Flash, LLaVA-OV-7B-Chat, InternVL2.5-78B, and Qwen2.5-VL-72B-Instruct. The…
Research Paper
Visual Contextual Attack: Jailbreaking MLLMs with Image-Driven Context Injection
Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.
View PaperEvidence
This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2507.02844Related research
- Multimodal Prompt Injection
Published September 1, 2025 · application-layer, prompt-layer, injection
- Hybrid Agent Prompt Injection
Published May 1, 2025 · prompt-layer, application-layer, injection
- On-Device LLM Hijacking
Published May 1, 2025 · application-layer, model-layer, prompt-layer