The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.
Single-Turn LLM Jailbreak
A single-turn prompt injection attack that bypasses LLM content moderation filters by simulating a multi-turn conversation escalating towards harmful or inappropriate outputs within a single prompt. The attack…
Paper-evaluated models(7)
GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini +4 more
- GPT-4
- GPT-4o
- GPT-4o Mini
- Llama 3 8B
- Llama 3 70B
- Llama 3.1 8B
- Llama 3.1 70B
Description
A single-turn prompt injection attack that bypasses LLM content moderation filters by simulating a multi-turn conversation escalating towards harmful or inappropriate outputs within a single prompt. The attack leverages the LLM's tendency to maintain context and continue established patterns, even when leading to undesirable content.
Examples
See https://github.com/alanaqrawi/STCA (opens in a new tab) for detailed examples. Examples include prompts designed to elicit:
- Explicit language in a high-stress scenario (e.g., characters trapped in a burning building).
- Controversial historical statements by simulating a role-playing scenario in 1938 Germany.
- Conspiracy theories linking a famous singer to Adolf Hitler.
Impact
Successful exploitation allows attackers to generate harmful, biased, or inappropriate content from LLMs, bypassing built-in safety measures. This can lead to the dissemination of misinformation, hate speech, and other forms of harmful content. The impact is amplified in applications where LLMs generate content directly for public consumption or decision-making.
Affected Systems
Multiple LLMs, including GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini, Llama-3 8B/70B, and Llama-3.1 8B/70B. The paper also reports Gemini-1.5 and Claude Sonnet without identifying their variants, so those aliases are excluded from model facets.
Mitigation Steps
- Develop more robust content moderation systems capable of detecting and mitigating sophisticated prompt injection attacks. This should include mechanisms beyond keyword filtering, considering context and narrative escalation.
- Implement advanced prompt sanitization and validation techniques to prevent the construction of exploitable single-turn prompts.
- Employ adversarial training methods to improve the resilience of LLMs against STCA and similar attacks.
- Conduct thorough security testing and red-teaming exercises to identify and address vulnerabilities in LLM deployments.
Research context and confidence
- Evidence and verification
- Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
- Primary research source linked.
- Severity
- Not rated by this catalog.
- Source and publication type
- arXiv · Research preprint.
- Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
- Author and publication status
- Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
- Threat model and attacker access
- Black-box model, service, or application access.
- Related deployment categories
- No related deployment category is classified.
- Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
- Affected systems
- Multiple LLMs, including GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini, Llama-3 8B/70B, and Llama-3.1 8B/70B. The paper also reports Gemini-1.5 and Claude Sonnet without identifying their variants, so those aliases are excluded from…
Research Paper
Well, that escalated quickly: The Single-Turn Crescendo Attack (STCA)
Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.
View PaperEvidence
This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.
https://arxiv.org/abs/2409.03131Related research
- Template and Suffix Optimization
Published November 1, 2025 · model-layer, prompt-layer, injection
- LLM Confidence Deception
Published July 1, 2025 · prompt-layer, injection, jailbreak
- LLM Router Rerouting
Published January 1, 2026 · application-layer, prompt-layer, injection