Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 5582da82
Paper published October 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Prompt Translation Jailbreak

A vulnerability in safety-aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms using adversarial prompt translation. The vulnerability stems from the ability to translate garbled…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models

No paper-evaluated models are recorded for this entry.

Description

A vulnerability in safety-aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms using adversarial prompt translation. The vulnerability stems from the ability to translate garbled adversarial prompts generated by gradient-based attacks into coherent, human-readable prompts that retain their adversarial capability. This allows for the successful transfer of attacks across different LLMs.

Examples

See https://github.com/qizhangli/Adversarial-Prompt-Translator (opens in a new tab). The paper provides several examples of garbled adversarial prompts and their translations which successfully jailbreak various LLMs, including GPT and Claude series models. Specific examples are included in Tables 1 and 3 of the paper.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows attackers to elicit harmful or unsafe responses from safety-aligned LLMs, bypassing intended safety restrictions. This can lead to the generation of illegal content, dissemination of misinformation, or other malicious activities. The high success rate and transferability of the attack across different LLMs are significant concerns.

Affected Systems

Various safety-aligned LLMs, including (but not limited to) GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4-Turbo, GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4o, Claude-Haiku, Claude-Sonnet, Llama-2-7B-Chat, Vicuna-7B-v1.5, and Mistral-7B-Instruct. The vulnerability is likely present in other similar LLMs.

Mitigation Steps

  • Implement robust detection mechanisms for adversarial prompts, possibly based on semantic analysis and perplexity scoring.
  • Develop and integrate more sophisticated safety filters that can effectively identify and block both garbled and translated adversarial prompts.
  • Improve the training data and methodologies used to align LLMs, making them more resistant to adversarial attacks. Focus on techniques that are robust against semantic manipulation.
  • Regularly update and refine safety mechanisms in response to new attack techniques.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Various safety-aligned LLMs, including (but not limited to) GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4-Turbo, GPT-4o-mini, GPT-4o, Claude-Haiku, Claude-Sonnet, Llama-2-7B-Chat, Vicuna-7B-v1.5, and Mistral-7B-Instruct. The…

Research Paper

Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11317