Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 8d084aed
Paper published October 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Implicit Reference Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to an attack vector termed "Attack via Implicit Reference" (AIR). AIR bypasses safety mechanisms by decomposing a malicious objective into multiple benign, seemingly…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(10)

Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini +7 more
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • GPT-4o-0513
  • Llama 3 70B
  • Llama 3 8B
  • Qwen 2 7B
  • Qwen 2 0.5B
  • Qwen 2 1.5B
  • Qwen 2 72B

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to an attack vector termed "Attack via Implicit Reference" (AIR). AIR bypasses safety mechanisms by decomposing a malicious objective into multiple benign, seemingly unrelated objectives linked through implicit contextual references. The LLM generates harmful content by combining the outputs of these seemingly harmless objectives, without explicitly triggering safety filters designed to detect direct requests for malicious content.

Examples

See GitHub repository https://github.com/Lucas-TY/llm_Implicit_reference (opens in a new tab). The repository contains specific prompt examples and attack trajectories demonstrating the AIR vulnerability against various LLMs including GPT-4, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and Qwen-2-72B.

Impact

Successful exploitation of this vulnerability allows an attacker to generate harmful content (e.g., instructions for creating weapons, hate speech, etc.) from LLMs, bypassing built-in safety and moderation features. The impact is exacerbated by the observation that larger LLMs are more susceptible to this attack.

Affected Systems

Multiple state-of-the-art LLMs, including (but not limited to) GPT-4, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and Qwen-2-72B, as well as other models with strong in-context learning capabilities. The vulnerability is observed across various model sizes, with larger models exhibiting a higher attack success rate.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improve context understanding in safety mechanisms to detect implicit connections between seemingly benign objectives.
  • Develop techniques to identify and flag potentially harmful content generated through chained or nested prompts, even if individual components seem harmless.
  • Implement robust detection methods that evaluate the overall context and potential implications of a series of prompts, rather than focusing solely on individual prompt keywords.
  • Investigate and address the observed inverse scaling phenomenon where larger models show increased vulnerability to this type of attack. This may require architectural changes to the models themselves.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Multiple state-of-the-art LLMs, including (but not limited to) GPT-4, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and Qwen-2-72B, as well as other models with strong in-context learning capabilities. The vulnerability is observed across…

Research Paper

You Know What I'm Saying: Jailbreak Attack via Implicit Reference

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2410.03857