Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 0eb0fc9b
Paper published November 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Image-Based Safety Snowballing

A vulnerability exists in several Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) where seemingly safe images, when combined with additional safe images and prompts using a specific attack methodology (Safety Snowball Agent), can…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(4)

  • GPT-4o
  • InternVL 2 40B
  • Qwen VL 2 72B
  • VILA 1.5 40B

Description

A vulnerability exists in several Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) where seemingly safe images, when combined with additional safe images and prompts using a specific attack methodology (Safety Snowball Agent), can trigger the generation of unsafe and harmful content. The vulnerability exploits the models' universal reasoning abilities and a "safety snowball effect," where an initial unsafe response leads to progressively more harmful outputs.

Examples

See the research paper's GitHub repository: https://github.com/gzcch/Safety_Snowball_Agent (opens in a new tab). The repository contains example prompts and images used to successfully jailbreak multiple LVLMs. Specific examples showing jailbreaks using images classified as "safe" by Google Cloud Vision are included within the paper.

Impact

Successful exploitation allows attackers to bypass LVLMs' safety filters and generate harmful content (e.g., violence, hate speech, illegal activity instructions) using inputs that would not normally be flagged as unsafe. This could lead to the dissemination of harmful information, the incitement of violence, or the generation of instructions for illegal activities.

Affected Systems

Multiple Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) including, but not limited to, GPT-4o, Intern-VL2, Qwen-VL2, and VILA. The vulnerability is likely present in other similar models.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improve safety filters to better detect and prevent the "safety snowball effect."
  • Develop more robust methods for identifying and mitigating unintended relationships inferred by the model across multiple inputs.
  • Implement multi-step reasoning capability in LVLMs to allow for self-correction and detection of unsafe outputs.
  • Employ additional security measures to prevent the exploitation of the model's inherent capabilities for overinterpretation.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
Vision-language models
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Multiple Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) including, but not limited to, GPT-4o, Intern-VL2, Qwen-VL2, and VILA. The vulnerability is likely present in other similar models.

Research Paper

Safe+ Safe= Unsafe? Exploring How Safe Images Can Be Exploited to Jailbreak Large Vision-Language Models

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2411.11496