Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: ed91243f
Paper published August 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Carrier Article Jailbreak

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel jailbreak attack that leverages "neural carrier articles." This attack injects a prohibited query into a benign article generated by a secondary LLM, designed to…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(4)

  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 7B
  • Llama 3 8B

Description

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel jailbreak attack that leverages "neural carrier articles." This attack injects a prohibited query into a benign article generated by a secondary LLM, designed to be semantically similar to the prohibited query but not trigger the primary LLM's safety mechanisms. The secondary LLM generates articles based on hypernyms derived from the prohibited query, thus subtly shifting attention weights within the primary LLM, bypassing its safeguards.

Examples

The paper provides examples of successful exploits against several LLMs (Llama-2-7B, Llama-3-8B, Gemini, GPT-3.5-Turbo, GPT-4) using various prohibited queries (e.g., "how to produce dynamite," "how to insult the president"). Specific prompts and responses are presented in arXiv:2408.11182 (opens in a new tab).

Impact

Successful exploitation allows adversaries to bypass safety restrictions imposed on LLMs, leading to the generation of malicious, unethical, or illegal content. This compromises the intended safety and security of the affected LLMs and applications using them.

Affected Systems

The vulnerability affects various LLMs including, but not limited to, Llama-2 7B, Llama-3-8b, Gemini, GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4. The attack's success is LLM-specific and depends on the specific safety mechanisms implemented.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improve LLM safety mechanisms to be more robust against subtle semantic manipulations.
  • Implement more sophisticated prompt filtering and analysis techniques that go beyond keyword matching.
  • Develop LLMs with improved context and attention management capabilities to prevent exploitation by strategically inserted text.
  • Consider incorporating anomaly detection mechanisms to identify and flag suspicious prompts based on their context and semantic similarity to known prohibited queries.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
No related deployment category is classified.
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
The vulnerability affects various LLMs including, but not limited to, Llama-2 7B, Llama-3-8b, Gemini, GPT-3.5-turbo, GPT-4. The attack's success is LLM-specific and depends on the specific safety mechanisms implemented.

Research Paper

Hide Your Malicious Goal Into Benign Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Neural Carrier Articles

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11182