Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research details
Back to research findings
LMVD-ID: 1651d2e5
Paper published December 1, 2024
Entry analyzed December 29, 2024
Paper-reported evidence
Confidence: Source-linked

The LMVD-ID is an internal research identifier, not an official CVE identifier.

Bimodal Black-Box Jailbreak

A bimodal adversarial attack, PBI-Attack, can manipulate Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) into generating toxic or harmful content by iteratively optimizing both textual and visual inputs in a black-box setting…

BibTeX citation

Paper-evaluated models(4)

  • GPT-4
  • InstructBLIP
  • MiniGPT-4
  • Qwen VL

Description

A bimodal adversarial attack, PBI-Attack, can manipulate Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) into generating toxic or harmful content by iteratively optimizing both textual and visual inputs in a black-box setting. The attack leverages a surrogate LVLM to inject malicious features from a harmful corpus into a benign image, then iteratively refines both image and text perturbations to maximize the toxicity of the model’s output as measured by a toxicity detection model (Perspective API or Detoxify).

Examples

See the paper "BAMBA: A Bimodal Adversarial Multi-Round Black-Box Jailbreak Attacker for LVLMs". Specific examples are provided in Appendix C of the paper illustrating successful jailbreaks across multiple open and closed-source LVLMs using various prompts related to generating harmful content.

Impact

This vulnerability allows attackers with black-box access to LVLMs to bypass safety measures and generate toxic or harmful content, potentially leading to the spread of misinformation and hate speech, harmful instructions, or other forms of malicious behavior. The ability to manipulate LVLMs in this manner significantly decreases their trustworthiness and reliability.

Affected Systems

Open and closed-source Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), including but not limited to MiniGPT-4, InstructBLIP, LLaVA, Gemini, GPT-4, and Qwen-VL. The attack's success rate varies across different models.

Mitigation Steps

  • Improved Toxicity Detection: Enhance the robustness and accuracy of toxicity detection models used within LVLMs to better identify and filter malicious inputs.
  • Adversarial Training: Train LVLMs on adversarial examples generated using techniques similar to PBI-Attack to increase their resilience to such attacks.
  • Input Sanitization: Implement more rigorous input sanitization techniques to detect and remove or neutralize malicious features embedded in both text and images.
  • Multi-Modal Defense Mechanisms: Develop multi-modal defense mechanisms that specifically address the coordinated manipulation of both textual and visual inputs.
  • Rate Limiting: Implement rate limiting to mitigate brute-force attacks aiming to find optimal adversarial perturbations.

Research context and confidence

Evidence and verification
Paper-reported; independent reproduction is not documented.
Primary research source linked.
Severity
Not rated by this catalog.
Source and publication type
arXiv · Research preprint.
Peer-review status is not provided by this source.
Author and publication status
Author metadata is not stored; see the primary paper.
Threat model and attacker access
Black-box model, service, or application access.
Related deployment categories
Vision-language models; Agent workflows
Taxonomy labels only; paper-specific deployment prerequisites are not inferred.
Affected systems
Open and closed-source Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs), including but not limited to MiniGPT-4, InstructBLIP, LLaVA, Gemini, GPT-4, and Qwen-VL. The attack's success rate varies across different models.

Research Paper

BAMBA: A Bimodal Adversarial Multi-Round Black-Box Jailbreak Attacker for LVLMs

Primary source: arXiv. Findings are reported by the cited research and have not been independently verified.

View Paper

Evidence

This entry is based on a primary research source. Its findings are paper-reported; independent reproduction and verification are not claimed.

https://arxiv.org/abs/2412.05892