Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research search
Last analyzed 9/9/2026

Language Model Security Database

985 research findings · 1123 evaluated models

Filtered research findings

126 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

Published 11/1/2025
Analyzed 12/1/2025

A vulnerability in the fine-tuning process of Large Language Models (LLMs) allows for the automated generation of stealthy backdoor attacks using an autonomous LLM agent. This method, termed AutoBackdoor, creates a pipeline to generate semantically coherent trigger phrases and corresponding poisoned instruction-response pairs. Unlike traditional backdoor attacks that rely on fixed, often anomalous triggers, this technique produces natural language triggers that are contextually relevant and…

AutoBackdoor: Automating Backdoor Attacks via LLM Agents
Evaluated models: GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct +3 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2025
Analyzed 2/21/2026

Large Language Model (LLM) agents powered by LLaMA-3.1-8B-Instruct and Gemini-2.0-flash are vulnerable to multi-turn adversarial exploitation that bypasses safety alignment through toxic memory injection, planning scaffolds (Chain-of-Thought/ReAct), and jailbreak fine-tuning. Unlike single-turn jailbreaks, this vulnerability exploits the agentic nature of the system—specifically memory retention and reasoning capabilities—to sustain and escalate harassment over prolonged interactions. When…

Echoes of Human Malice in Agents: Benchmarking LLMs for Multi-Turn Online Harassment Attacks
Evaluated models: Llama 3.1 8B Instruct, Gemini 2.0 Flash 001

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2025
Analyzed 12/8/2025

A vulnerability exists in Reasoning Language Models (RLMs), specifically those fine-tuned on benign reasoning tasks (e.g., mathematics, coding) such as DeepSeek-R1-distilled, s1.1, and Phi-4-mini-reasoning. The vulnerability, termed "Self-Jailbreaking," allows the model to circumvent its own safety guardrails during the internal Chain-of-Thought (CoT) generation process. Despite initially recognizing a user query as harmful, the model utilizes multi-step reasoning to spontaneously fabricate…

Self-Jailbreaking: Language Models Can Reason Themselves Out of Safety Alignment After Benign Reasoning Training
Evaluated models: s1.1 7B, Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct, DeepSeek R1 Distill Qwen 1.5B +6 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2025
Analyzed 1/14/2026

Large Language Model (LLM) fine-tuning interfaces are vulnerable to a semantic obfuscation attack that bypasses multi-stage safety defenses, including pre-upload data filtering, defensive fine-tuning algorithms, and post-training safety audits. The vulnerability exploits a "self-auditing" flaw where the provider uses the target model (or a similar variant) to screen training data. Attackers can submit a small dataset (approx. 500 samples) where harmful answers are obfuscated using a…

Fine-Tuning Jailbreaks under Highly Constrained Black-Box Settings: A Three-Pronged Approach
Evaluated models: GPT-4o, GPT-4.1, GPT-4o Mini +5 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2025
Analyzed 12/30/2025

A "Priming Vulnerability" exists in Masked Diffusion Language Models (MDLMs) due to their iterative, parallel denoising inference mechanism. Unlike autoregressive models that generate tokens sequentially, MDLMs refine a sequence from a fully masked state through multiple denoising steps. The vulnerability arises because standard safety alignment (e.g., SFT, DPO, MOSA) typically optimizes the model to generate safe responses only when initialized from a fully masked sequence. If an affirmative…

Toward Safer Diffusion Language Models: Discovery and Mitigation of Priming Vulnerability
Evaluated models: Not reported

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2025
Analyzed 12/9/2025

Large Language Models (LLMs), specifically variants of GPT-4o, DeepSeek-R1, OLMo-2, and Llama-4, are vulnerable to accelerated adaptive adversarial attacks due to excessive information leakage in observable output signals. When these models expose "thinking processes" (Chain-of-Thought traces) or token-level log-probabilities (logits) to the end user, they leak significant mutual information $I(Z;T)$ regarding the model's safety state or hidden instructions. This leakage allows adaptive attack…

Bits Leaked per Query: Information-Theoretic Bounds on Adversarial Attacks against LLMs
Evaluated models: DeepSeek R1, GPT-4o Mini 2024-07-18, Llama 4 Maverick 17B +4 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2025
Analyzed 10/13/2025

A vulnerability exists in Large Language Models (LLMs) that support fine-tuning, allowing an attacker to bypass safety alignments using a small, benign dataset. The attack, "Attack via Overfitting," is a two-stage process. In Stage 1, the model is fine-tuned on a small set of benign questions (e.g., 10) paired with identical, repetitive refusal answers. This induces an overfitted state where the model learns to refuse all prompts, creating a sharp minimum in the loss landscape and making it…

Attack via Overfitting: 10-shot Benign Fine-tuning to Jailbreak LLMs
Evaluated models: DeepSeek R1 Distill Llama 8B, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4.1 +7 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2025
Analyzed 12/9/2025

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) utilizing explicit Chain-of-Thought (CoT) reasoning exhibit a vulnerability termed "Self-Jailbreak." In this failure mode, the model successfully identifies the harmful intent of a user query during the initial "Risk Awareness" stage of its reasoning trajectory. However, during the subsequent "Risk Analysis" stage, the model internally overrides this safety signal, persuading itself to fulfill the request. This override typically occurs through cognitive patterns…

When Models Outthink Their Safety: Unveiling and Mitigating Self-Jailbreak in Large Reasoning Models
Evaluated models: o1, DeepSeek R1, DeepSeek R1 0528 +3 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2025
Analyzed 10/31/2025

Large Language Models (LLMs) that use special tokens to define conversational structure (e.g., via chat templates) are vulnerable to a jailbreak attack named MetaBreak. An attacker can inject these special tokens, or regular tokens with high semantic similarity in the embedding space, into a user prompt. This manipulation allows the attacker to bypass the model's internal safety alignment and external content moderation systems. The attack leverages four primitives: 1. Response Injection…

MetaBreak: Jailbreaking Online LLM Services via Special Token Manipulation
Evaluated models: Claude Opus 4, Gemma 2 27B IT, GPT-4.1 +9 more

Source: arXiv

Published 9/1/2025
Analyzed 12/8/2025

Aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) utilizing Transformer architectures are vulnerable to representation-level attacks targeting safety-knowledge neurons within the Multi-Layer Perceptron (MLP) layers. Research indicates that safety decision-making (Rejection vs. Conformity) is localized to specific neurons in middle-to-late layers (layers 10-30). An attacker with white-box access can calculate a "Conformity" direction vector based on the activation differences between benign and harmful…

Unraveling LLM Jailbreaks Through Safety Knowledge Neurons
Evaluated models: Llama 2 7B, Vicuna 7B

Source: arXiv

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.