Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research search
Last analyzed 9/9/2026

Language Model Security Database

985 research findings · 1123 evaluated models

Filtered research findings

736 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 12/28/2024

A multi-round attack against Large Language Models (LLMs) allows bypassing safety mechanisms by iteratively refining prompts to elicit undesired behavior. The attack leverages the LLM's tendency to adjust its response based on preceding interactions, circumventing single-round prompt filtering defenses.

Multi-round jailbreak attack on large language models
Evaluated models: Not reported

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 12/29/2024

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a multi-turn jailbreak attack, termed "Jigsaw Puzzles" (JSP), which circumvents existing safeguards by splitting harmful questions into harmless fragments. The LLM is prompted to reconstruct and answer the complete question from these fragments, resulting in the generation of harmful responses. The attack relies on the LLM's ability to piece together seemingly benign input to form a malicious query, exploiting the model's contextual understanding…

Jigsaw Puzzles: Splitting Harmful Questions to Jailbreak Large Language Models
Evaluated models: Gemini 1.5 Pro, GPT-4, GPT-4o +2 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 12/28/2024

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to multi-turn adversarial attacks where malicious users obscure harmful intents across multiple queries. The ActorAttack method leverages the LLM's own knowledge base to discover semantically linked "actors" related to a harmful target. By posing seemingly innocuous questions about these actors, the attacker guides the LLM towards revealing harmful information step-by-step, accumulating knowledge until the desired malicious output is obtained, even…

Derail Yourself: Multi-turn LLM Jailbreak Attack through Self-discovered Clues
Evaluated models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4 +3 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 7/14/2025

Large Language Models (LLMs) trained with safety mechanisms exhibit biases which disproportionately allow successful "jailbreak" attacks (circumvention of safety protocols to generate harmful content) when targeting prompts related to marginalized groups compared to privileged groups. This vulnerability stems from the unintended correlation between safety alignment techniques and demographic keywords, creating a higher success rate for malicious prompts incorporating keywords associated with…

Biasjailbreak: analyzing ethical biases and jailbreak vulnerabilities in large language models
Evaluated models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4 +7 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 12/29/2024

A vulnerability in safety-aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms using adversarial prompt translation. The vulnerability stems from the ability to translate garbled adversarial prompts generated by gradient-based attacks into coherent, human-readable prompts that retain their adversarial capability. This allows for the successful transfer of attacks across different LLMs.

Deciphering the Chaos: Enhancing Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Prompt Translation
Evaluated models: Not reported

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 7/14/2025

Large Language Model (LLM) detectors are vulnerable to a realistic adversarial attack ("RAFT") that substitutes words in machine-generated text to evade detection. The attack leverages an auxiliary LLM to select optimal words for substitution based on their impact on the target detector's score, while maintaining grammatical correctness and semantic coherence. This allows the attacker to significantly reduce the probability of detection (up to 99%) while preserving text quality, making the…

Raft: Realistic attacks to fool text detectors
Evaluated models: GPT-2, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4 +11 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 12/28/2024

Large language models (LLMs) controlling robots are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks. The ROBOPAIR algorithm demonstrates that malicious prompts can bypass safety mechanisms, causing robots to perform harmful physical actions. This vulnerability exploits the LLM's reliance on textual prompts and its potential lack of sufficient contextual understanding to prevent unsafe commands. The attack is effective across different access levels.

Jailbreaking LLM-controlled robots
Evaluated models: GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4o +1 more

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 12/28/2024

Large Language Models (LLMs) used in chemical synthesis applications are vulnerable to a novel attack vector, dubbed "SMILES-prompting," which leverages the Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) notation to bypass safety mechanisms and elicit instructions for synthesizing hazardous substances. The attack exploits the LLM's inability to effectively filter or interpret SMILES strings representing dangerous chemicals, leading to the disclosure of synthesis procedures.

SMILES-Prompting: A Novel Approach to LLM Jailbreak Attacks in Chemical Synthesis
Evaluated models: GPT-4o, Llama 3 70B Instruct

Source: arXiv

Published 10/1/2024
Analyzed 12/29/2024

A denial-of-service (DoS) vulnerability exists in certain Large Language Model (LLM) safeguard implementations due to susceptibility to adversarial prompts. Attackers can inject short, seemingly innocuous adversarial prompts into user prompt templates, causing the safeguard to incorrectly classify legitimate user requests as unsafe and reject them. This allows for a DoS attack against specific users without requiring modification of the LLM itself.

Safeguard is a Double-edged Sword: Denial-of-service Attack on Large Language Models
Evaluated models: GPT-4o Mini, Llama Guard 2 8B, Llama Guard 3 8B +2 more

Source: arXiv

Published 9/1/2024
Analyzed 12/29/2024

AdaPPA is a jailbreak attack that exploits the varying levels of alignment protection in LLMs at different output positions. It leverages the model's instruction-following capabilities by pre-filling the output with carefully crafted "safe" content, creating a perceived completion and lowering the model's guard before generating malicious content. The attack's effectiveness relies on the adaptive generation of both safe and harmful pre-fill content, strategically placed to exploit weaknesses…

AdaPPA: Adaptive Position Pre-Fill Jailbreak Attack Approach Targeting LLMs
Evaluated models: ChatGLM3 6B, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini +5 more

Source: arXiv

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.