Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research search
Last analyzed Sep 9, 2026

Language Model Security Database

985 research findings · 1119 evaluated models

Filtered research findings

556 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

Random Token T2I Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A heuristic token search attack, termed HTS-Attack, can bypass safety mechanisms in text-to-image (T2I) models, allowing generation of NSFW content. The attack iteratively replaces tokens in a malicious prompt with semantically similar tokens from the model's vocabulary, avoiding detection by prompt and image checkers. The method leverages a surrogate CLIP model to maintain semantic similarity to the target NSFW prompt.

Rt-attack: Jailbreaking text-to-image models via random token
Evaluated models: Clip-vit-base-patch32, DALL-E 3, GPT 3.5-turbo-instruct+4 more
  • Clip-vit-base-patch32
  • DALL-E 3
  • GPT 3.5-turbo-instruct
  • Safegen
  • Sld
  • Stable Diffusion v1.4
  • Stable Diffusion v1.5

LLM Adversarial Suffix Optimization

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel black-box jailbreaking attack, ECLIPSE, which leverages the LLM's own capabilities as an optimizer to generate adversarial suffixes. ECLIPSE iteratively refines these suffixes based on a harmfulness score, bypassing the need for pre-defined affirmative phrases used in previous optimization-based attacks. This allows for effective jailbreaking even with limited interaction and without white-box access to the LLM's internal parameters.

Unlocking Adversarial Suffix Optimization Without Affirmative Phrases: Efficient Black-box Jailbreaking via LLM as Optimizer
Evaluated models: Falcon 7B Instruct, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Llama 2 7B Chat+1 more
  • Falcon 7B Instruct
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Vicuna 7B

Carrier Article Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel jailbreak attack that leverages "neural carrier articles." This attack injects a prohibited query into a benign article generated by a secondary LLM, designed to be semantically similar to the prohibited query but not trigger the primary LLM's safety mechanisms. The secondary LLM generates articles based on hypernyms derived from the prohibited query, thus subtly shifting attention weights within the primary LLM, bypassing its safeguards.

Hide Your Malicious Goal Into Benign Narratives: Jailbreak Large Language Models through Neural Carrier Articles
Evaluated models: GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, Llama 2 7B+1 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 7B
  • Llama 3 8B

LCCT Data Extraction & Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Model (LLM)-based Code Completion Tools (LCCTs), such as GitHub Copilot and Amazon Q, are vulnerable to jailbreaking and training data extraction attacks due to their unique workflows and reliance on proprietary code datasets. Jailbreaking attacks exploit the LLM's ability to generate harmful content by embedding malicious prompts within various code components (filenames, comments, variable names, function calls). Training data extraction attacks leverage the LLM's tendency to…

Security Attacks on LLM-based Code Completion Tools
Evaluated models: GPT 3.5-turbo-0125, GPT-4 Turbo-2024-04-09, GPT-4o-2024-05-13

Perceptual Text-to-Image Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A perception-guided jailbreak (PGJ) attack allows bypassing safety filters in text-to-image models. The attack leverages Large Language Models (LLMs) to identify safe phrases that are perceptually similar to unsafe words but semantically different. This allows the generation of NSFW images using prompts that evade the model's safety mechanisms.

Perception-guided jailbreak against text-to-image models
Evaluated models: Cogview3, Dall-e 2, DALL-E 3+5 more
  • Cogview3
  • Dall-e 2
  • DALL-E 3
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Hunyuan
  • Sdxl
  • Tongyiwanxiang

Synthetic LLM Jailbreak Dataset

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks leveraging synthetically generated prompts. A novel pipeline, SAGE-RT, generates a diverse dataset of 51,000 prompt-response pairs designed to exploit LLMs' vulnerabilities across various categories of harmfulness. These prompts successfully jailbreak state-of-the-art LLMs in a significant percentage of tested sub-categories, including 100% of macro-categories for certain models like GPT-4 and GPT-3.5-turbo. The vulnerability…

Sage-rt: Synthetic alignment data generation for safety evaluation and red teaming
Evaluated models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemma 7B IT, GPT-3.5 Turbo+8 more
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Gemma 7B IT
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • Llama 2 70B Chat
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3 70B Instruct
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct
  • Mistral 7B Instruct

Kov: MDP-Based LLM Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to naturalistic adversarial attacks crafted using Markov Decision Processes (MDPs) and Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS). These attacks generate natural-language prompts that elicit harmful, violent, or discriminatory responses from the LLMs, even those with built-in safety mechanisms. The attacks are transferable across different LLMs, demonstrating a generalized vulnerability.

Kov: Transferable and Naturalistic Black-Box LLM Attacks using Markov Decision Processes and Tree Search
Evaluated models: FastChat-T5 3B, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4+1 more
  • FastChat-T5 3B
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Vicuna 7B

Composable Jailbreak Synthesis

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to composable jailbreak attacks, allowing bypass of safety filters through the chaining of multiple prompt transformations. The vulnerability arises from the ability to combine seemingly innocuous transformations to create effective attacks that achieve high attack success rates (ASR). These attacks can be synthesized automatically, allowing for the creation of novel and highly effective jailbreaks. Specifically, using the h4rm3l framework, attacks…

h4rm3l: A dynamic benchmark of composable jailbreak attacks for llm safety assessment
Evaluated models: Claude 3 Haiku, Claude 3 Sonnet, GPT-3.5 Turbo+3 more
  • Claude 3 Haiku
  • Claude 3 Sonnet
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • Llama 3 70B
  • Llama 3 8B

Contextual Fusion Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a multi-turn context-based jailbreak attack, termed Context Fusion Attack (CFA). CFA leverages the LLM's ability to understand context in multi-turn dialogues to bypass security mechanisms designed to prevent harmful outputs. The attack involves strategically crafting a series of prompts that build context, subtly introducing malicious keywords, and ultimately triggering the LLM to generate unsafe content. The malicious intent is masked within the…

Multi-Turn Context Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models From First Principles
Evaluated models: ChatGLM4, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4

Ensemble Jailbreak Technique

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

The Ensemble Jailbreak (EnJa) attack exploits vulnerabilities in the safety mechanisms of large language models (LLMs) by combining prompt-level and token-level attacks. EnJa conceals malicious instructions within seemingly benign prompts, then uses a gradient-based method to optimize adversarial suffixes, significantly increasing the likelihood of bypassing safety filters and generating harmful content. The attack leverages a connector template to seamlessly integrate the concealed prompt and…

EnJa: Ensemble Jailbreak on Large Language Models
Evaluated models: GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, Llama 2 13B+3 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 13B
  • Llama 2 7B
  • Vicuna 13B
  • Vicuna 7B

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.

Discovery and publication are separate: new papers enter a candidate queue, then require human review and explicit approval before publication. Updates follow that review process, not a guaranteed daily publishing schedule. “Last analyzed” is the newest analysis date among published entries; it does not mean that all recent research has been covered.