Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research search
Last analyzed Sep 9, 2026

Language Model Security Database

985 research findings · 1119 evaluated models

Filtered research findings

556 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

Bijection-Based LLM Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel "bijection learning" attack that leverages in-context learning to teach the model a custom string-to-string encoding, bypassing built-in safety mechanisms. The attack encodes harmful queries, sends them to the model, and decodes the response, effectively circumventing safety filters. The complexity of the encoding can be controlled, adapting the attack to various LLMs; more capable models are more susceptible to complex encodings.

Endless Jailbreaks with Bijection Learning
Evaluated models: Claude 3 Haiku, Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet+5 more
  • Claude 3 Haiku
  • Claude 3 Opus
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 3.1 8B
  • Llama Guard 3

Left-Side Noise Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) exhibit a left-to-right processing bias, making them vulnerable to "FlipAttack." This attack disguises a harmful prompt by flipping (reversing) the order of characters or words, thereby reducing the LLM’s comprehension of the harmful content. A "flipping guidance" module then instructs the LLM to reverse the flipped text, revealing and executing the original harmful prompt.

FlipAttack: Jailbreak LLMs via Flipping
Evaluated models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4+5 more
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 3.1 405B
  • Mixtral 8x22B

Concealed Multi-Turn Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel multi-turn jailbreaking attack, termed "RED QUEEN ATTACK." This attack uses multi-turn conversations to conceal malicious intent by framing the user as a protector seeking to prevent harmful actions by others. The LLM, instead of detecting the concealed malicious intent, provides information that facilitates the harmful action under the guise of assisting in prevention efforts.

RED QUEEN: Safeguarding Large Language Models against Concealed Multi-Turn Jailbreaking
Evaluated models: GPT-4o

Automated LLM Fuzz Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A novel black-box attack framework leverages fuzz testing to automatically generate concise and semantically coherent prompts that bypass safety mechanisms in large language models (LLMs), eliciting harmful or offensive responses. The attack starts with an empty seed pool, utilizes LLM-assisted mutation strategies (Role-play, Contextualization, Expand), and employs a two-level judge module for efficient identification of successful jailbreaks. The attack's effectiveness is demonstrated across…

Effective and Evasive Fuzz Testing-Driven Jailbreaking Attacks against LLMs
Evaluated models: Baichuan 2 7B Chat, Gemini Pro, GPT-3.5 Turbo+4 more
  • Baichuan 2 7B Chat
  • Gemini Pro
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Guanaco 7B
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Vicuna 7B v1.3

Reinforcement Learning Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

PathSeeker demonstrates a novel black-box jailbreak attack against Large Language Models (LLMs) that utilizes multi-agent reinforcement learning. The attack iteratively modifies input prompts based on model responses, leveraging a reward mechanism focused on vocabulary expansion in the LLM's output to circumvent safety mechanisms and elicit harmful responses. This technique bypasses existing safety filters by encouraging the model to relax its constraints, rather than directly targeting…

PathSeeker: Exploring LLM Security Vulnerabilities with a Reinforcement Learning-Based Jailbreak Approach
Evaluated models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, DeepSeek Chat, Deepseek-coder+14 more
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • DeepSeek Chat
  • Deepseek-coder
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash
  • Gemma2-8B-instruct
  • Glm-4-air
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 2 13B Chat
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3 70B
  • Llama 3.1 405B
  • Llama 3.1 70B
  • Llama 3.1 8B
  • Mistral Nemo
  • Qwen 2 7B Instruct
  • Vicuna 7B

Symbolic Math Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a jailbreaking attack, termed "MathPrompt," which leverages the models' ability to process symbolic mathematics to bypass built-in safety mechanisms. The attack encodes harmful natural language prompts into mathematically formulated problems, causing the LLM to generate unsafe outputs while ostensibly solving a mathematical problem.

Jailbreaking Large Language Models with Symbolic Mathematics
Evaluated models: Claude 3 Haiku, Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3 Sonnet+10 more
  • Claude 3 Haiku
  • Claude 3 Opus
  • Claude 3 Sonnet
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash (block None)
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro (block None)
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 3.1 70B

RAG Worm Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Jailbreaking vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) used in Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) systems allow escalation of attacks from entity extraction to full document extraction and enable the propagation of self-replicating malicious prompts ("worms") within interconnected RAG applications. Exploitation leverages prompt injection to force the LLM to return retrieved documents or execute malicious actions specified within the prompt.

Unleashing worms and extracting data: Escalating the outcome of attacks against rag-based inference in scale and severity using jailbreaking
Evaluated models: Gemini 1.5 Flash

Adaptive Position Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

AdaPPA is a jailbreak attack that exploits the varying levels of alignment protection in LLMs at different output positions. It leverages the model's instruction-following capabilities by pre-filling the output with carefully crafted "safe" content, creating a perceived completion and lowering the model's guard before generating malicious content. The attack's effectiveness relies on the adaptive generation of both safe and harmful pre-fill content, strategically placed to exploit weaknesses…

AdaPPA: Adaptive Position Pre-Fill Jailbreak Attack Approach Targeting LLMs
Evaluated models: ChatGLM3 6B, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini+5 more
  • ChatGLM3 6B
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 2 13B
  • Llama 2 7B
  • Llama 3 8B
  • Vicuna 13B
  • Vicuna 7B

Single-Turn LLM Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A single-turn prompt injection attack that bypasses LLM content moderation filters by simulating a multi-turn conversation escalating towards harmful or inappropriate outputs within a single prompt. The attack leverages the LLM's tendency to maintain context and continue established patterns, even when leading to undesirable content.

Well, that escalated quickly: The Single-Turn Crescendo Attack (STCA)
Evaluated models: GPT-4, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini+4 more
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 3 8B
  • Llama 3 70B
  • Llama 3.1 8B
  • Llama 3.1 70B

Attack LLMs with Toxic Answers

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a targeted jailbreak attack, termed Atoxia, which can force the generation of specific harmful content. The attack operates by providing a target toxic answer to an attacker model, which then generates a corresponding adversarial query and a misleading "answer opening" (prefix). When the query and the answer prefix are presented to a vulnerable LLM, the model is induced to continue the generation, bypassing its safety alignment and completing the…

Atoxia: Red-teaming Large Language Models with Target Toxic Answers
Evaluated models: GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, GPT-4o+5 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct
  • Mistral 7B
  • Vicuna 7B v1.5

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.

Discovery and publication are separate: new papers enter a candidate queue, then require human review and explicit approval before publication. Updates follow that review process, not a guaranteed daily publishing schedule. “Last analyzed” is the newest analysis date among published entries; it does not mean that all recent research has been covered.