Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research search
Last analyzed Sep 9, 2026

Language Model Security Database

985 research findings · 1119 evaluated models

Filtered research findings

406 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

BarkPlug Data Poisoning Attack

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A poisoning attack against a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system that manipulates the retriever component by injecting a poisoned document into the data used by the embedding model. This poisoned document contains modified and incorrect information. When activated, the system retrieves the poisoned document and uses it to generate misleading, biased, and unfaithful responses to user queries.

Poison Attacks and Adversarial Prompts Against an Informed University Virtual Assistant
Evaluated models: Barkplug V.2

SQL Injection Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A novel SQL Injection Jailbreak (SIJ) vulnerability allows attackers to bypass safety mechanisms in Large Language Models (LLMs) by manipulating the structure of input prompts. The attack leverages the model's processing of system prompts, user prefixes, user prompts, and assistant prefixes to effectively "comment out" the expected response prefix and inject harmful instructions, causing the LLM to generate unsafe content. This vulnerability exploits the external properties of the LLM…

SQL Injection Jailbreak: a structural disaster of large language models
Evaluated models: DeepSeek LLM 7B Chat, Llama 2 7B Chat, Llama 3.1 8B Instruct+2 more
  • DeepSeek LLM 7B Chat
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
  • Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2
  • Vicuna 7B v1.5

Nonlinear Prompt Jailbreak Features

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreak attacks exploiting nonlinear features within prompt encodings. These features, not detectable by linear methods, allow adversaries to reliably elicit harmful outputs despite safety training. Different attack methods leverage distinct nonlinear features, limiting the transferability of detection and mitigation techniques.

What Features in Prompts Jailbreak LLMs? Investigating the Mechanisms Behind Attacks
Evaluated models: Gemma 7B IT, Llama 3 8B Instruct

Composable String Jailbreaks

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to jailbreaking attacks using sequences of invertible string transformations (string compositions). Attackers can combine multiple transformations (e.g., leetspeak, Base64, ROT13, word reversal) to obfuscate malicious prompts, bypassing safety mechanisms that detect simpler attacks. Even with safety training, the models fail to correctly interpret the transformed input and produce unsafe outputs.

Plentiful Jailbreaks with String Compositions
Evaluated models: Claude 3 Haiku, Claude 3 Opus, Claude 3.5 Sonnet+2 more
  • Claude 3 Haiku
  • Claude 3 Opus
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini

Emoji Judge Bypass

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) used as safety judges are vulnerable to an "Emoji Attack," a prompt injection technique that leverages token segmentation bias. Inserting emojis within tokens alters sub-token embeddings, misleading the judge LLM into classifying harmful content as safe. The attack's effectiveness is amplified by strategically placing emojis to maximize the embedding discrepancy between sub-tokens and the original token.

Emoji Attack: A Method for Misleading Judge LLMs in Safety Risk Detection
Evaluated models: GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4, Llama Guard+3 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • Llama Guard
  • Llama Guard 2
  • ShieldLM
  • WildGuard

Benign Mirroring Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to stealthy jailbreak attacks leveraging benign data mirroring. Attackers train a local "mirror model" on benign data obtained from the target LLM. This mirror model, mimicking the target's behavior, is then used to generate adversarial prompts, which are subsequently deployed against the target LLM, bypassing content moderation systems due to the lack of overtly malicious content in the initial data gathering phase.

Stealthy Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models via Benign Data Mirroring
Evaluated models: GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4o Mini, Llama 2 Chat+1 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 2 Chat
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct

Enhanced Jailbreak Transferability

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A novel jailbreak attack, dubbed SI-GCG, against Large Language Models (LLMs) leverages a fixed harmful template and optimized suffix selection to bypass safety mechanisms and elicit harmful responses with high transferability. The attack utilizes a scenario induction template and a refined optimization process to improve the consistency and effectiveness of the jailbreak across different LLMs. The vulnerability stems from the inability of current safety measures to adequately defend against…

Boosting jailbreak transferability for large language models
Evaluated models: Not reported

SMILES-Prompting LLM Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) used in chemical synthesis applications are vulnerable to a novel attack vector, dubbed "SMILES-prompting," which leverages the Simplified Molecular-Input Line-Entry System (SMILES) notation to bypass safety mechanisms and elicit instructions for synthesizing hazardous substances. The attack exploits the LLM's inability to effectively filter or interpret SMILES strings representing dangerous chemicals, leading to the disclosure of synthesis procedures.

SMILES-Prompting: A Novel Approach to LLM Jailbreak Attacks in Chemical Synthesis
Evaluated models: GPT-4o, Llama 3 70B Instruct

Faster GCG LLM Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Faster-GCG is an optimized jailbreak attack that exploits vulnerabilities in aligned Large Language Models (LLMs) by efficiently finding adversarial prompt suffixes. The attack leverages gradient information to iteratively refine a harmful prompt, overcoming limitations of prior methods like GCG by incorporating a regularization term to improve gradient approximation, using deterministic greedy sampling, and preventing self-looping during optimization. This allows for significantly higher…

Faster-GCG: Efficient discrete optimization jailbreak attacks against aligned large language models
Evaluated models: GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4 Turbo, Llama 2 7B Chat+1 more
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Vicuna 13B v1.5

Attention-Based LLM Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to attention-based jailbreak attacks. Attackers can craft prompts that strategically divert the LLM's attention away from sensitive words, causing the model to overlook malicious intent and generate harmful content. This occurs by leveraging the LLM's attention mechanism to focus on benign parts of the prompt while embedding harmful queries within a seemingly harmless context. The success of the attack is correlated with specific attention…

Feint and Attack: Attention-Based Strategies for Jailbreaking and Protecting LLMs
Evaluated models: Claude 3 Haiku, GPT-4, Llama 2 13B Chat+2 more
  • Claude 3 Haiku
  • GPT-4
  • Llama 2 13B Chat
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3 8B

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.

Discovery and publication are separate: new papers enter a candidate queue, then require human review and explicit approval before publication. Updates follow that review process, not a guaranteed daily publishing schedule. “Last analyzed” is the newest analysis date among published entries; it does not mean that all recent research has been covered.