Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research search
Last analyzed Sep 9, 2026

Language Model Security Database

985 research findings · 1119 evaluated models

Filtered research findings

406 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

Metaphor-Based LLM Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to a novel jailbreaking attack leveraging adversarial metaphors. The attack, termed AVATAR, induces the LLM to reason about benign metaphors related to harmful tasks, ultimately leading to the generation of harmful content either directly or through calibration of metaphorical and professional harmful content. The attack exploits the LLM's cognitive mapping process, bypassing standard safety mechanisms.

from Benign import Toxic: Jailbreaking the Language Model via Adversarial Metaphors
Evaluated models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GLM 3 6B, GPT-4o+8 more
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • GLM 3 6B
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Llama 3 8B
  • Llama 3.1 8B
  • Mistral 7B
  • o1
  • Qwen 2 72B
  • Qwen 2.5 32B
  • Qwen 2.5 7B

Zero-Perturbation Emoji Attack

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

The Emoti-Attack vulnerability constitutes a zero-word-perturbation adversarial attack against Natural Language Processing (NLP) systems and Large Language Models (LLMs). The vulnerability exploits the discrete embedding space of emojis and emoticons to manipulate model behavior without altering the semantic content or character integrity of the original text. By appending strategically optimized emoji sequences to the prefix and suffix of an input string (formalized as $s \oplus x \oplus…

Emoti-Attack: Zero-Perturbation Adversarial Attacks on NLP Systems via Emoji Sequences
Evaluated models: Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct, Llama 3 8B Instruct, GPT-4o+4 more
  • Qwen 2.5 7B Instruct
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct
  • GPT-4o
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Gemini Exp 1206
  • BERT
  • RoBERTa

ICL Permutation Exploit

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Autoregressive Large Language Models (LLMs) utilizing In-Context Learning (ICL) are vulnerable to demonstration permutation attacks due to inherent sensitivity to the ordering of input examples. This vulnerability arises from the limitations of unidirectional attention mechanisms and standard Empirical Risk Minimization (ERM) training, which fails to account for worst-case input permutations. An attacker can exploit this by permuting the order of valid, semantically correct few-shot…

PEARL: Towards permutation-resilient LLMs
Evaluated models: Llama 2 7B, Llama 3 8B, Mistral 7B+1 more
  • Llama 2 7B
  • Llama 3 8B
  • Mistral 7B
  • Gemma 7B

Iterative Chaos Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are vulnerable to a novel jailbreak attack, "Mousetrap," which leverages the models' reasoning capabilities to elicit harmful responses. Mousetrap uses a "Chaos Machine" to iteratively transform prompts via one-to-one mappings (e.g., character substitutions, word reversals), creating complex reasoning chains that confuse the LRM and cause it to generate unsafe outputs despite safety mechanisms. The iterative nature of the attack, combined with role-playing…

A Mousetrap: Fooling Large Reasoning Models for Jailbreak with Chain of Iterative Chaos
Evaluated models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking, o1-mini

LLM Syntax Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to structure transformation attacks, where malicious prompts are encoded in diverse syntax spaces (e.g., SQL, JSON, LLM-generated syntaxes) to bypass safety mechanisms. These attacks maintain the harmful intent while altering the linguistic structure, making detection based on token-level patterns ineffective.

StructTransform: A Scalable Attack Surface for Safety-Aligned Large Language Models
Evaluated models: BERT, Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o+5 more
  • BERT
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • GPT-4o
  • Llama 3 8B
  • Llama 3.2 3B
  • Llama 3.2 90B
  • Mistral 7B
  • o1

LLM Watermark Neutralization

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Model (LLM) watermarking schemes based on n-gram probability biases (specifically KGW, SynthID-Text, MinHash, and SkipHash) are vulnerable to adversarial removal during Knowledge Distillation. When a student model is trained on the output of a watermarked teacher model, it inherits the watermark's statistical biases ("radioactivity"). An attacker can exploit this inheritance by comparing the student model's output token probabilities against a base model to extract the…

Can LLM Watermarks Robustly Prevent Unauthorized Knowledge Distillation?
Evaluated models: GLM 4 9B Chat, Llama 7B, Llama 3.2 1B

Learned Instruction Rewriting Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to "Rewrite to Jailbreak" (R2J) attacks. R2J exploits the models' safety mechanisms by iteratively rewriting harmful prompts, subtly altering wording to bypass safety filters while maintaining the original malicious intent. This differs from previous methods which rely on adding extraneous prefixes/suffixes or creating forced instruction-following scenarios, thus being more difficult to detect.

Rewrite to Jailbreak: Discover Learnable and Transferable Implicit Harmfulness Instruction
Evaluated models: Gemini Pro, GPT-3.5 Turbo, Llama 2 7B Chat+1 more
  • Gemini Pro
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3 8B

Reasoning-Augmented Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to multi-turn jailbreak attacks leveraging the model's reasoning capabilities. The attack, RACE, reformulates harmful queries into benign reasoning tasks, exploiting the LLM's ability to perform complex reasoning to ultimately generate unsafe content. This bypasses standard safety mechanisms designed to prevent the generation of harmful responses.

Reasoning-Augmented Conversation for Multi-Turn Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models
Evaluated models: DeepSeek R1, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking+6 more
  • DeepSeek R1
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro
  • Gemini 2.0 Flash Thinking
  • Gemma 2 9B
  • GLM 4 9B Chat
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4o
  • o1
  • Qwen 2 7B Instruct

CRI Jailbreak Initialization

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

CRI (Compliance Refusal Initialization) initializes jailbreak attacks by leveraging pre-trained jailbreak prompts, effectively guiding the optimization process towards the compliance subspace of harmful prompts. This significantly enhances the success rate and reduces the computational overhead of attacks, often requiring only a single optimization step to bypass safety mechanisms. Attacks utilizing CRI demonstrate significantly improved ASR (Adversarial Success Rate) and reduced median steps…

Jailbreak Attack Initializations as Extractors of Compliance Directions
Evaluated models: Falcon 7B Instruct, Llama 2 7B Chat, Llama 3 8B Instruct+5 more
  • Falcon 7B Instruct
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Llama 3 8B Instruct
  • Mistral 7B Instruct v0.2
  • Mistral 7B Instruct v0.3
  • Phi-4
  • Qwen 2.5 Coder 7B Instruct
  • Vicuna 7B v1.3

Query Code Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to QueryAttack, a novel jailbreak technique that leverages structured, non-natural query languages (e.g., SQL, URL formats, or other programming language constructs) to bypass safety alignment mechanisms. The attack translates malicious natural language queries into these structured formats, exploiting the LLM's ability to understand and process such languages without triggering safety filters designed for natural language prompts. The LLM then…

QueryAttack: Jailbreaking Aligned Large Language Models Using Structured Non-natural Query Language
Evaluated models: DeepSeek Chat, DeepSeek R1, Gemini 1.5 Flash+11 more
  • DeepSeek Chat
  • DeepSeek R1
  • Gemini 1.5 Flash
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • Llama 3.1 70B Instruct
  • Llama 3.1 8B Instruct
  • Llama 3.2 11B Vision Instruct
  • Llama 3.2 1B Instruct
  • Llama 3.2 3B Instruct
  • Llama 3.3 70B Instruct
  • o1

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.

Discovery and publication are separate: new papers enter a candidate queue, then require human review and explicit approval before publication. Updates follow that review process, not a guaranteed daily publishing schedule. “Last analyzed” is the newest analysis date among published entries; it does not mean that all recent research has been covered.