Skip to main content
LLM Security Database
Skip to research search
Last analyzed Sep 9, 2026

Language Model Security Database

985 research findings · 1119 evaluated models

Filtered research findings

273 entries

Matches every word across titles, descriptions, sources, affected systems, and models.

Agent Action Hijacking

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A vulnerability in LLM-based agents, dubbed AI Agent Injection (AI²), allows attackers to hijack the agent's actions by manipulating the agent's memory retrieval mechanism. The attack involves two main steps: (1) Stealing action-aware knowledge from the agent's memory using crafted adversarial queries targeting the retriever module and (2) Generating Trojan prompts consisting of a Trojan string and hijacking instructions. The Trojan string is designed to manipulate the retriever into…

Towards Action Hijacking of Large Language Model-based Agent
Evaluated models: BERT, GPT-3, GPT-4+2 more
  • BERT
  • GPT-3
  • GPT-4
  • M3E
  • MiniLM

Adversarial Tool Injection Attacks

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Model (LLM) tool-calling systems are vulnerable to adversarial tool injection attacks. Attackers can inject malicious tools ("Manipulator Tools") into the tool platform, manipulating the LLM's tool selection and execution process. This allows for privacy theft (extracting user queries), denial-of-service (DoS) attacks against legitimate tools, and unscheduled tool-calling (forcing the use of attacker-specified tools regardless of relevance). The attack exploits vulnerabilities…

From Allies to Adversaries: Manipulating LLM Tool-Calling through Adversarial Injection
Evaluated models: GPT-4o Mini, Llama 3 8B Instruct, Qwen 2 7B Instruct

Audio Adversarial Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Audio-Language Models (LALMs) are vulnerable to a stealthy adversarial jailbreak attack, AdvWave, which leverages a dual-phase optimization to overcome gradient shattering caused by audio discretization. The attack crafts adversarial audio by adding perceptually realistic environmental noise, making it difficult to detect. The attack also dynamically adapts the adversarial target based on the LALM's response patterns.

AdvWave: Stealthy Adversarial Jailbreak Attack against Large Audio-Language Models
Evaluated models: GPT-4o, Llama Omni, Qwen 2 Audio+1 more
  • GPT-4o
  • Llama Omni
  • Qwen 2 Audio
  • SpeechGPT

Semantic Confusion Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

The Antelope attack exploits vulnerabilities in Text-to-Image (T2I) models' safety filters by crafting adversarial prompts. These prompts, while appearing benign, induce the generation of NSFW images by leveraging semantic similarity between harmless and harmful concepts. The attack involves replacing explicit terms in an original prompt with seemingly innocuous alternatives and appending carefully selected suffix tokens. This manipulation bypasses both text-based and image-based filters…

Antelope: Potent and Concealed Jailbreak Attack Strategy
Evaluated models: GPT-4o, Midjourney, Stable Diffusion+2 more
  • GPT-4o
  • Midjourney
  • Stable Diffusion
  • Stable Diffusion v1.4
  • Stable Diffusion v2.1

Multimodal Risk Diffusion Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) are vulnerable to a heuristic-induced multimodal risk distribution jailbreak attack. The attack successfully circumvents safety mechanisms by distributing malicious prompts across text and image modalities, preventing detection of harmful intent within either modality alone. An auxiliary LLM generates prompts to guide the target MLLM into reconstructing the malicious prompt and producing the desired harmful output.

Heuristic-Induced Multimodal Risk Distribution Jailbreak Attack for Multimodal Large Language Models
Evaluated models: Deepseek-vl7B-chat, Gemini 1.5 Pro, Glm-4v-9B+7 more
  • Deepseek-vl7B-chat
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro
  • Glm-4v-9B
  • GPT-4o-0513
  • Llava v1.5-7B
  • Llava v1.6-mistral-7B-hf
  • MiniGPT-4
  • Qwen VL Chat
  • Qwen VL Max
  • Yi-vl-34B

Multi-Modal VLM Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A novel jailbreak attack, Multi-Modal Linkage (MML), exploits the vulnerability in Large Vision-Language Models (VLMs) by leveraging an "encryption-decryption" scheme across text and image modalities. MML encrypts malicious queries within images (e.g., using word replacement, image transformations) to bypass initial safety mechanisms. A subsequent text prompt guides the VLM to "decrypt" the content, eliciting harmful outputs. "Evil alignment," framing the attack within a video game scenario…

Jailbreak Large Visual Language Models Through Multi-Modal Linkage
Evaluated models: Claude 3.5 Sonnet, GPT-4o, GPT-4o Mini+1 more
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • GPT-4o
  • GPT-4o Mini
  • Qwen VL Max

Image-Based Safety Snowballing

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A vulnerability exists in several Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) where seemingly safe images, when combined with additional safe images and prompts using a specific attack methodology (Safety Snowball Agent), can trigger the generation of unsafe and harmful content. The vulnerability exploits the models' universal reasoning abilities and a "safety snowball effect," where an initial unsafe response leads to progressively more harmful outputs.

Safe+ Safe= Unsafe? Exploring How Safe Images Can Be Exploited to Jailbreak Large Vision-Language Models
Evaluated models: GPT-4o, InternVL 2 40B, Qwen VL 2 72B+1 more
  • GPT-4o
  • InternVL 2 40B
  • Qwen VL 2 72B
  • VILA 1.5 40B

Multi-Round Jailbreak Agent

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Large Language Models (LLMs) are vulnerable to multi-round jailbreak attacks which leverage a heuristic search process to progressively elicit harmful content. The attack decomposes a harmful query into multiple, seemingly innocuous sub-queries, iteratively refining the prompts based on the LLM's responses and employing psychological strategies to bypass safety mechanisms. This allows for the circumvention of single-round detection methods and elicitation of responses containing prohibited…

MRJ-Agent: An Effective Jailbreak Agent for Multi-Round Dialogue
Evaluated models: DALL-E 3, GPT-3.5 Turbo, GPT-4+4 more
  • DALL-E 3
  • GPT-3.5 Turbo
  • GPT-4
  • GPT-4o
  • Llama 2 7B Chat
  • Mistral-7B-instruct-0.2
  • Vicuna-7B-1.5

BarkPlug Data Poisoning Attack

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

A poisoning attack against a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) system that manipulates the retriever component by injecting a poisoned document into the data used by the embedding model. This poisoned document contains modified and incorrect information. When activated, the system retrieves the poisoned document and uses it to generate misleading, biased, and unfaithful responses to user queries.

Poison Attacks and Adversarial Prompts Against an Informed University Virtual Assistant
Evaluated models: Barkplug V.2

Browser Agent Jailbreak

Published Analyzed Source: arXiv

Refusal-trained Large Language Models (LLMs) show decreased safety when deployed as browser agents compared to their performance in chatbot settings. Attack methods effective at jailbreaking LLMs in chat contexts also successfully bypass safety mechanisms in browser agents, leading to the execution of harmful behaviors. This vulnerability stems from a lack of generalization of safety training to agentic, real-world interaction scenarios and the increased context available to the agent (browser…

Refusal-Trained LLMs Are Easily Jailbroken As Browser Agents
Evaluated models: o1-preview, o1-mini, GPT-4 Turbo+5 more
  • o1-preview
  • o1-mini
  • GPT-4 Turbo
  • GPT-4o
  • Claude 3 Opus
  • Claude 3.5 Sonnet
  • Llama 3.1 405B
  • Gemini 1.5 Pro

Research methodology

Entries summarize publicly available primary-source security research. Model names reflect only systems explicitly evaluated by the cited paper, and measurements are research-reported unless independent verification is stated.

Discovery and publication are separate: new papers enter a candidate queue, then require human review and explicit approval before publication. Updates follow that review process, not a guaranteed daily publishing schedule. “Last analyzed” is the newest analysis date among published entries; it does not mean that all recent research has been covered.